Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
EIGHMIE LAW FIRM EIGHMIE LAW FIRM
  • CALL TO SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

Top Three Search Warrant Exceptions in Florida

shutterstock_1357295837

The search warrant requirement is one of the most basic civil liberties in the United States. The Fourth Amendment requires officers to submit affidavits supported by probable cause before they obtain search warrants. Over the years, the Supreme Court has carved out some exceptions to the warrant requirement. The major exceptions are examined below.

If the evidence was illegally seized, a Florida judge will most likely throw the case out of court. That’s especially true in drug possession and other matters which depend almost exclusively on physical evidence. Even if a judge allows the case to continue, the lack of evidence gives a Port St. Lucie criminal defense attorney additional leverage during pretrial negotiations.

Consent

This exception is probably the most common one. When they arrest or detain suspects, police officers almost always ask to search them or their belongings. This request need not have flowery language and the defendant need not sign a  waiver or anything like that. If an officer asks “Can I look in your backpack?” and the owner or apparent owner says “Okay,” that’s sufficient.

Let’s look at these responses a bit closer. Generally, the consent exception hinges on such matters. Consent is an affirmative, voluntary act. Stepping away from the backpack or even handing it to an officer is usually not consent.

An apparent owner might be someone who is carrying the backpack but does not actually own it. Officers cannot keep asking people in a group for consent until one of them provides it.

Plain View

If officers are lawfully in a certain place and they see drugs or other contraband in plain view, they may seize it without a warrant.

The lawful presence element is sometimes an issue. Police cannot detain suspects unless they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Reasonable suspicion is basically an evidence-based hunch. Police cannot arrest suspects unless they have probable cause. That’s a much higher evidentiary standard.

Partial plain view seizures might be an issue as well. For example, if an officer sees a pistol grip protruding from underneath a seat, that grip could belong to a real gun or a BB gun.

Exigent Circumstances

This exception and the plain view exception often go together. If officers believe someone is in trouble, they may enter a dwelling or other building without a warrant. While inside, they may sweep through the building. If they see contraband during such sweeps, they may seize it.

These safety sweeps have limited scopes. Officers cannot look in every corner, and they definitely cannot open locked boxes or other containers without an owner’s consent. Furthermore, if officers believe there is a gas leak in the house, they cannot search a detached shed or garage.

Reach Out to an Experienced Lawyer

Officers do not always need search warrants before they seize evidence. For a free consultation with an experienced Port St. Lucie criminal attorney, contact Eighmie Law Firm, P.A. We routinely handle matters throughout the Treasure Coast area.

https://www.eighmielawfirm.com/some-effective-defenses-to-assault-and-other-violent-criminal-charges/

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation